“Pay your kids and write it off.” It sounds like the kind of tax trick that gets you audited. So most business owners either dismiss it as too good to be true, or they do it the lazy way: set the kid’s salary to the standard deduction, take the deduction, and hope nobody asks questions.
Both approaches miss what’s actually here. Hiring family members is one of the few tax strategies the IRS publishes the rules for. Done correctly, it shifts income from your high bracket to your child’s zero bracket, opens Roth IRA contributions that compound tax-free for fifty years, funds a spouse’s retirement plan, and can even raise your QBI deduction. The savings are real and recurring. We’ve taken clients from $0 in retirement contributions to over $117,000 a year using pieces of this exact playbook.
But the strategy that looks too good to be true does have a catch. It isn’t the rules. It’s the documentation. The owners who get reclassified in an audit aren’t the ones who hired their kids. They’re the ones who paid a 7-year-old a $16,000 “marketing director” salary with no timesheet, no job description, and the money deposited into the parent’s own account.
This post walks the whole strategy: how much you can pay each family member, which entity structures unlock the biggest savings, the Roth IRA wealth transfer, the QBI interaction, and the five mistakes that turn a legitimate deduction into a penalty. Done right, it’s one of the cleanest tax moves you can make.
What are the tax benefits of hiring family members?
What are the tax benefits of hiring family members?
Hiring family members shifts income from the business owner's high tax bracket to the family member's lower (often zero) bracket while creating a deductible wage expense for the business. For sole props and partnerships of both parents, wages paid to children under 18 are also exempt from Social Security and Medicare (FICA) and exempt from FUTA until age 21. Net effect for many families: federal income tax reduction plus complete payroll tax exemption on wages that would have been the owner's taxable income.
For the right business and right situation, paying family members can be a smart income-shifting strategy. The main goal is to shift the income from a high bracket, the business owner, to a lower bracket, a child or parent. The business receives a deduction for the payroll expense, reducing their taxable income, and the individual recognizes the income at a lower tax bracket.
There can be multiple benefits of income-shifting. Not just paying less tax on that particular piece of income, but it could push the business owner’s personal return under thresholds for credits or deductions. For example, the current SALT phaseout begins at $500,000. If the business owner is currently above that threshold but can shift income off their return to another return, they could pay less tax and open up a large tax deduction on top of it.
Depending on where the income is shifted to, the recipient could receive that income tax-free. In 2026, the standard deduction for an individual is $16,100. If the pay received is less than the standard deduction, that money would come in tax-free.
Depending on the type of business entity, the business can also avoid paying FICA (Social Security and Medicare) taxes, which is additional tax savings for the business owner. If the person that is getting paid is under 18 years old and the business is the parents’ business, neither the business nor the child has to pay FICA taxes. If they are under 21, they don’t have to pay unemployment taxes.
A sole proprietor in the 37% bracket who pays their child $15,000 a year for their services would receive $5,550 in tax savings. As the business owner’s bracket increases, this strategy only becomes more appealing.
How much can you pay your child tax-free?
How much can you pay your child tax-free?
A child can earn up to the standard deduction ($16,100 for 2026) before owing any federal income tax. But you can't simply set their salary to that number. The wages must be reasonable for the work actually performed (Treasury Reg. §1.162-7). For most young children doing age-appropriate work, the reasonable wage lands below the standard deduction, making it tax-free to the child while still reducing the owner's taxable income at their marginal rate.
“You should set your kid’s salary to the standard deduction.”
That is the war cry of most tax preparers.
You get to take a deduction and as long as all income is below the standard deduction, it is tax-free to the kid.
Clean. Simple. Easy.
And wrong.
Treasury Regulation §1.162-7(a) informs us that a business can only deduct wages that are (1) reasonable in amount, (2) based on services actually rendered, and (3) paid or incurred. Reasonable in this sense is what you would pay an outside party for the same services your child provides.
There are multiple ways you can look to determine a reasonable compensation for your child or related party.
Simply setting their salary to match the standard deduction every year is not a method for reasonable compensation. It is a method of tax fraud.
Kids should be treated as normal employees and follow your normal employment procedures, such as keeping a timesheet and proper documentation of work provided.
On the plus side, most kids won’t work enough to warrant a large salary. Younger kids mainly do odds-and-ends jobs, such as admin, janitorial work, filing, data entry, or modeling clothes and accessories. Most of these jobs have a reasonable wage that falls under the standard deduction, which equals tax-free income for your child.
In 2026, the standard deduction is $16,100. Any income below that level is tax-free. As a business owner, if you pay your child $15,000/year and you are in the 32% marginal tax bracket, that is a $4,800 tax savings for you and $0 tax for your child.
If you have multiple children working in your company, that tax savings compounds.
At what age can you put your child on payroll?
At what age can you put your child on payroll?
There is no federal minimum age for hiring your own child in your own business, but state child labor laws apply and the work must be age-appropriate. Most practitioners start at age 7 or 8 with simple tasks (filing, model work, basic data entry). The IRS has approved wages for children as young as 7 in audit-defended cases when the work was real, documented, and age-appropriate. State labor laws may impose stricter rules. Check your state before starting.
Federal child labor laws do not apply to children of a parent’s business. Your state’s child labor laws could be different, so verify your state’s laws before employing children.
If your children are younger, you need to make sure they are assigned age-appropriate duties and paid accordingly. Paying a 7-year-old $16,000/year for specialty technical work is probably not appropriate. But paying a 7-year-old for basic filing or data entry is appropriate, assuming you set a reasonable salary for that job, hours, and skill level.
In the case Eller v. Commissioner, the Eller family employed their children, ages 7, 11, and 12, for various jobs in their business. The IRS challenged and disallowed some of the compensation paid to the kids as they deemed it to be unreasonable and excessive. The courts upheld that the compensation paid to the kids was “reasonable in amount and based on services actually rendered.”
As kids get older, their job description and salary can increase. We’ve seen a lot of children move from filing documents at a young age to handling marketing and social media as they get older. Naturally, as their skills, time, and responsibility increase, their salary can increase to match.
If you are paying your 17-year-old child $20,000 to handle social media and marketing, you would receive a deduction on that amount and they would pay a small tax on the income. If you were in the 32% marginal tax bracket and your kid was only in the 10% tax bracket, you are looking at a tax savings of $6,010.
Does this work for every entity type? (S-corp, LLC, sole prop, C-corp)
Does hiring family members work for S-corp, LLC, and C-corp owners?
Yes for all entity types, but the FICA exemption for children under 18 only applies when the business is a sole proprietorship, a single-member LLC taxed as a sole proprietorship, or a partnership of both parents. S-corps, C-corps, and multi-member LLCs with non-parent partners all owe FICA on family wages. The income-shifting and standard deduction shield still work for every entity, but the payroll tax savings are bigger for the FICA-exempt structures.
| Entity Type | FICA exemption (kids under 18)? | FUTA exemption (kids under 21)? | Income shifting works? |
| Sole proprietorship | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Single-member LLC (default tax treatment) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Partnership of both parents | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Partnership with non-parent partner | No | No | Yes |
| S-Corporation | No | No | Yes |
| C-Corporation | No | No | Yes |
| LLC taxed as S-Corp/C-Copr | No | No | Yes |
You can hire your kids in any type of business entity structure.
But some structures are better, in terms of savings, than others.
Income shifting is achievable with each structure as you are moving income from one tax return (business or business owner) to another tax return (child’s tax return). Ideally, this shift allows that income to flow from a higher tax bracket to a lower tax bracket.
Where the entity structure matters is when we look at FICA (Social Security and Medicare) and FUTA (unemployment) tax.
Sole proprietors and LLCs (filing as a disregarded entity) are your best entity structures. Both of these structures file on a Schedule C right on the business owner’s personal tax return.
Both of these structures allow the business owner and the child to avoid paying FICA taxes if they are under 18, and FUTA taxes if they are under 21. If you are paying your child $10,000 a year, that is $1,530 in tax savings from FICA alone.
The next structure to consider is a partnership. A partnership can be created by having a multi-member LLC or more organically by having a husband and wife go into business as co-owners. If the partnership only has the parents as partners, you can still avoid FICA and FUTA taxes. If the partnership brings in outside partners, non-parents, then you have to pay FICA and FUTA taxes. You still get the ability to shift income, but the tax savings is not as great.
All the rest of the structures, LLC taxed as S-corp, S-corp, and C-corp, are the same. You get the tax savings from the income shift but you cannot avoid FICA and FUTA taxes.
When you are in an entity structure/tax election that doesn’t allow you to avoid FICA and FUTA taxes, you have several options.
- You just suck it up and pay the FICA and FUTA taxes. You may need to hire your kid just because the business needs help and they are a cheap/good resource. The pay is so minimal that you don’t really want to go through the hassle of trying to avoid FICA/FUTA taxes. Or, even with paying the additional taxes there is still significant tax savings from the income shift.
- You can change your current entity/tax election to one that is more suitable for this purpose (disregarded entity). That is really letting the tax tail wag the dog so this is not a method I would use unless there were other reasons to change your entity structure. It can take a lot to unwind an S-corp or C-corp so you really need to consider all ramifications before you change your entity structure. Partnership with your spouse can be easier to unwind if they are willing to lose their share of the partnership, but you should still consider other options to take advantage of hiring your kids.
- Multi-entity structure can be the best way to structure hiring children but there are things you need to consider. As we’ve discussed, having multiple entities layered on top of each other can be a great way to produce significant tax savings, with the caveat that the additional entities need to have legitimate business reasons for being formed. There are a lot of reasons out there that can be used, but tax avoidance is not one of them.
A lot of tax strategists want you to form a Family Management Company (FMC) to hire your child to perform services for your corporation.
This is tax avoidance. Don’t do that.
It bears repeating: businesses need legitimate reasons for being formed and you cannot use tax avoidance as the reason.
Tom Gorczynski highlights why a Family Management Company would fail the Economic Substance Doctrine under Internal Revenue Manual Exhibit 4.46.4-4:
- Transaction includes unnecessary steps
- Transaction is not at arm’s length with unrelated third parties
- Transaction creates no meaningful economic change on a present value basis (pre-tax)
- Taxpayer’s potential for gain or loss is artificially limited
- Transaction has no credible business purpose apart from federal tax benefits
- Transaction has no meaningful potential for profit apart from tax benefits
- Transaction has no significant risk of loss
- Tax benefit is artificially generated by the transaction
- Transaction is outside the taxpayer’s ordinary business operations
Hiring your spouse: the Solo 401(k) amplification
How much can you pay your spouse tax-free?
There is no tax-free ceiling on spousal wages. Wages paid to a spouse are taxable to the spouse at their bracket. But the strategic value isn't tax-free wages. It's that spousal employment opens a separate Solo 401(k) for the spouse, doubling household retirement contribution capacity. A spouse paid $35,000 with full Solo 401(k) maximization can shelter most of that wage into pre-tax retirement contributions, effectively making the salary tax-deferred until retirement.
Kids are not the only family members that you can hire.
Spouses can also be hired into the business, albeit for different benefits. You are no longer looking at income-shifting as your primary benefit, since their income is most likely on the same return as the business owner.
The situation where that isn’t true is a C-corp. In that case we are shifting income from the 21% flat tax to a personal tax return.
Hiring a spouse allows you to shift income from your personal and business tax return to a retirement plan.
We worked with the Whitmore family on a tax plan to hire James’s spouse, Carol. She was already performing administrative and trading-research work for the business, but she wasn’t being paid. Once James switched to an S-corp to save on FICA taxes, he officially hired his wife into the business. We conducted a reasonable compensation analysis for Carol and concluded that her annual salary should be $35,000. We also established a Solo 401(k) retirement plan for the business where Carol contributed $31,000 (using catch-up contribution) a year into her pre-tax 401(k) plan.
This strategy increased their tax savings by $13,535 a year.
The business received a deduction for the salary expense to Carol. Carol deducted the majority of the income by contributing to her Solo 401(k), so no additional income tax was paid on the income. The only taxes that had to be paid by the business and Carol were FICA and FUTA taxes.
Don’t just stop at Solo 401(k)s as being the only retirement plan to consider. There are a lot of retirement plans that could perform better such as a SIMPLE or SEP IRA. You can also stack retirement plans together by adding a Cash Balance or Defined Benefit Plan. This is a great way to move money out of the business and into retirement accounts, unlocking tax savings along the way. The Whitmores were able to go from $0 being contributed into retirement savings to $117,250 going into retirement accounts.
With any tax strategy, we need to make sure we have legitimate business reasons for the strategy. We do not want a ghost employee. That is, someone who is on payroll, collecting a W-2 for tax benefits, and not performing any work. It doesn’t matter if it’s your kid, parent, or spouse. They should be treated as if they were any other outside employee. They should have real responsibilities, real hours, and real work for the business.
If you can’t make that happen, either find a way to make it happen or move on to a different strategy.
See what hiring your spouse could do for your retirement savings. Book a 30-minute discovery call.
Hiring your kids: the Roth IRA stealth wealth transfer
Can my child contribute to a Roth IRA from wages I pay them?
Yes, and this is one of the most underused wealth-transfer strategies in the IRC. A child with earned income from a legitimate job (including wages from a parent's business) can contribute to a Roth IRA up to the lesser of their earned income or the annual contribution limit ($7,500 for 2026). The wages are shielded by the standard deduction, the Roth contribution grows tax-free for decades, and qualified withdrawals in retirement are entirely tax-free.
Just like in the previous section, hiring kids can unlock their own savings into a retirement plan.
A Roth IRA is a great account for a kid to contribute to. Roth IRAs are after-tax accounts so the money contributed does not get deducted from their tax return. That is a good thing. Since most of their income is below the standard deduction, it won’t be taxed anyway.
The Roth account gets invested in the stock market, grows tax-free, and when they remove the funds in retirement, it comes out tax-free.
If you max out a Roth IRA between the ages of 12 and 22, at a 7% growth rate, you end up with over $1.2 million in retirement. The benefits are real.
After-tax accounts are great when your tax bracket is at its lowest. You want to fund after-tax accounts when your bracket is low. When you are in your peak earning years and your bracket is higher, that is when you want to target pre-tax accounts.
In 2026, you can contribute a max of $7,500 into your Roth IRA or 100% of your earned income, whichever is less. That last part is key. You need earned income.
That means, unless the child is working and earning a salary, they cannot contribute to their Roth IRA. By hiring your child in your business, you can save on tax and unlock the ability for them to contribute to their Roth IRA.
What kid wants to work only to have to contribute it all to a retirement account they can’t touch for another 50 years?
Luckily, the IRS does not require the contribution be made with the money that is earned. As a parent, you could match the earnings for the child and contribute it to their Roth IRA.
For example, you pay your child $5,000 a year to work in your business doing admin work. You help your child set up a savings account to keep that $5,000 for a rainy day or future house purchase. In the meantime, you also take $5,000 of your own money and contribute it to their Roth IRA for them. You get to income shift $5,000 of that money and your kid walks away with $10,000 in savings ($5,000 in a savings account and $5,000 in a Roth IRA).
How does hiring family members interact with the QBI deduction?
Does hiring family members affect my QBI deduction?
It depends on whether you're above or below the QBI income phaseout. Below the phaseout, family wages simply reduce your QBI-eligible income (lowering the 20% deduction). Above the phaseout, where the W-2 wage cap applies, family wages COUNT toward the cap and can actually increase your allowable QBI deduction. For high-income owners running an S-Corp or partnership, hiring family can simultaneously create deductible wages AND raise the QBI cap.
When thinking about tax planning, you need to consider the effect it has on the Qualified Business Income (QBI / §199A) deduction.
QBI is a 20% deduction for pass-through entities. This was put in place in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) as a way to level pass-through income with the new flat 21% C-corp tax rate. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) made the QBI deduction permanent.
The 20% deduction that QBI brings means it is incredibly important to plan around. There are thresholds to be mindful of when considering QBI. In 2026, for a single filer, your QBI threshold is between $201,751 and $276,750. For a married filing jointly filer, it is between $403,501 and $553,500. Once you are between those thresholds, you begin to lose your QBI deduction, and once you are above them, you could lose it completely.
Those thresholds get broken down further depending on the type of business you are. If you are a Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB), you are more limited on QBI vs a non-SSTB. SSTBs consist of businesses that use the owner’s knowledge and skill to drive the majority of revenue, such as doctors, lawyers, accountants, athletes, financial planners, consultants, etc.
If you are an SSTB and you go above the threshold range, you lose QBI completely. If you can pull your income below or into the thresholds, you can unlock the QBI deduction.
If you are a non-SSTB and you go above the threshold range, your QBI is limited to 50% of your W-2 wages from the business. For a sole proprietor or disregarded LLC, your personal W-2 wages are $0.
By adding family wages or wages from other employees, you can increase your QBI cap.
Let’s look at an S-corp owner with $400K of pass-through income (after their $90K owner salary), above the QBI threshold. The QBI cap = 50% of $90K = $45K.
Add $35K spouse + $15K child = $140K total W-2 wages.
New QBI cap = 50% of $140K = $70K.
Family payroll just unlocked $25K of additional QBI deduction worth $6,000 at 24% marginal rate.
There’s a ceiling on this. Past a certain point, the family wages reduce your pass-through income faster than they raise the wage cap, so the QBI benefit tops out. The right number is the one we solve for, not the biggest one you can justify.
When you look at the total effect of family payroll, you can have enormous tax savings every year.
- Shift income from the business owner’s higher tax bracket to a child’s lower tax bracket
- Child’s income gets absorbed by the standard deduction so the child doesn’t pay any additional tax
- Child gets earned income and can contribute that income to a Roth IRA
- Spouse is hired to move additional funds from the business to a retirement plan
- Income shifting unlocks additional credits and deductions like the QBI deduction
The five mistakes that turn this strategy into an audit
What mistakes get audited when hiring family members?
Five mistakes trigger most family-payroll audits: (1) Wages that don't match documented work, (2) age-inappropriate "jobs" with no real output, (3) wages paid into the parent's bank account instead of the child's, (4) no W-4, W-2, or contemporaneous timesheets, and (5) wages set above market rate for the actual work. Each mistake triggers IRS reclassification of the wages as a non-deductible gift, plus accuracy-related penalties under IRC §6662 and interest.
Mistake 1 — Wages that don’t match documented work
To get the biggest tax benefit, taxpayers gravitate towards paying kids the standard deduction every year. This allows the business owner to deduct the payroll expense and allows the kid to claim the income tax-free.
It rarely lines up that kids do the exact amount of work to get paid exactly the standard deduction. Paying a 7- to 12-year-old $16,000 a year is most likely too much money for the amount of work they are doing. At these ages, kids are mainly doing data entry or filing, a job that would pay low minimum wage. They are also not working enough hours to add up to a full-time salary. At a job that would pay $25/hour, that is a little over 12 hours a week to meet $16,000/year. That is a lot for a kid still in school and wanting to play with their friends.
It is important to match the wages with the actual work being performed. You need defensible proof that your child is being paid a fair and accurate wage. Otherwise, the IRS will reclassify those wages as nondeductible gifts and assess accuracy-related penalties under §6662(a).
In the tax court case Denman v. Commissioner, the court held that the parent must pay a wage that is reasonable for the work performed.
Mistake 2 — Age-inappropriate “jobs” with no real output
Your 7-year-old marketing director won’t pass the IRS audit test.
Giving kids big, important titles is a good way to pay them a higher salary but unfortunately that is not reasonable given the skills, experience, and work output.
When assigning jobs to your kids, you need to take into account what they will actually be doing and build their position and salary around that.
The IRS will flag ghost employees, employees on payroll who are not producing any work, only collecting a paycheck.
Mistake 3 — Wages paid into the parent’s bank account
When paying a relative, we don’t want to give the IRS any ammunition to reclassify those wages as nondeductible gifts and hit us with a §6662(a) accuracy-related penalty.
That means, when you pay your child, don’t just move the money into your own personal bank account. You need to show these wages were actually paid to your child for work performed in your business. Having the money go directly into your bank account gives the IRS an area to lean on when they audit the legitimacy of these wages.
Set up a bank account or custodial account for your child and deposit those wages into the account. It is important to treat your child as if you hired an outside employee. Follow all the same rules as you do with any other employee.
Mistake 4 — No W-4, W-2, or contemporaneous timesheets
You may think you can skip most of the important documents when you hire your own child. After all, it’s your child, they are not going to complain about not having timesheets or a paystub. While this may be easier, it is wrong.
It bears repeating: you must treat your child as if they were any other employee.
That means they need to be issued a W-2 at the end of the year, and you need to file payroll tax forms 940/941. Your child should have timesheets, proof of work performed, a job description, and a reasonable compensation analysis. They need all the things a regular employee should have.
You don’t want to give the IRS any reason to reclassify their wages to nondeductible gifts. If you’ve filed all the correct paperwork and have documentation proving this is a legitimate hire, the IRS will have trouble making their case.
Mistake 5 — Wages above market rate
Your kid’s wages are no different than your own or another employee’s. You should take all the same steps in establishing reasonable compensation as you would for yourself. Paying above market rate so you can get more income tax-free is a red flag that should be avoided.
If you don’t set the market rate, the IRS will, and it will reclassify all wages above that amount. It is much better for your case to show your written methodology of how reasonable compensation was determined.
When to talk to a wealth-and-tax advisor
When should I talk to an advisor about my entity structure?
Family payroll touches three planning domains at once: business tax (deductible wages), personal tax (standard deduction shield), and long-term wealth transfer (Roth IRAs for kids, retirement contributions for spouse). Most CPAs handle one domain. The math we run for clients integrates all three, plus the entity-specific mechanics and the QBI interaction. The right time to talk is before the first family payroll check goes out, getting documentation right from day one is much cheaper than fixing it under audit.
Hiring family members looks simple on the surface, but it touches three different parts of your financial life at once: your business tax return, your personal tax return, and your family’s long-term wealth. Most CPAs handle one of those at a time. The income shift, the QBI interaction, the Roth IRA wealth transfer, the spousal retirement contributions, and the entity-specific FICA mechanics all have to be solved together to get the full benefit.
That’s the work we do. We run the numbers across all three domains, set the reasonable compensation, and build the documentation that holds up if the IRS ever looks. The best time to do this is before the first family payroll check goes out. Getting it right from day one is far cheaper than fixing it under audit.
If any of these apply, it’s worth a conversation:
See how much you could save by hiring family members the right way. Book a 30-minute discovery call.
Summary
Hiring family members is one of the few tax strategies where the IRS hands you the rulebook. The wages are deductible. The income shifts to a lower bracket. The standard deduction shields it. The Roth IRA compounds it. The QBI cap can even work in your favor. None of it is a loophole. It’s all in the code.
The owners who miss out usually aren’t blocked by the rules. They’re blocked by the assumption that something this good must have a catch. There is a catch, but it isn’t the strategy. It’s the documentation. Treat your family like real employees, pay them a reasonable wage for real work, keep the paperwork, and the savings are yours to keep.
The strategy isn’t the hard part. The documentation is.
Hiring family members shifts income from the business owner's high tax bracket to the family member's lower bracket while creating a deductible wage expense for the business. For sole proprietorships and partnerships of both parents, wages paid to children under 18 are also exempt from Social Security, Medicare (FICA), and FUTA until age 21. The combined effect is federal income tax savings at the owner's marginal rate plus potential complete payroll tax exemption on wages that would have been the owner's taxable income.
For 2026, a child can earn up to the standard deduction ($16,100 for single filers under OBBBA) before owing any federal income tax. A business owner can pay legitimate wages up to that amount with zero federal income tax owed by the child. The wages also reduce the owner's taxable income, generating savings at the owner's marginal rate. The strategy saves tax twice: once at the owner's bracket and once by shielding the child's earned income.
There is no federal minimum age for hiring your own child in your own business, but the work must be age-appropriate and state child labor laws apply. Most practitioners start at age 7 or 8 with simple tasks like filing, model work, or basic data entry. The IRS has approved wages for children as young as 7 in audit-defended cases, provided the work was real, documented, and age-appropriate.
There is no tax-free ceiling on spousal wages, wages paid to a spouse are taxable to the spouse at their bracket. The strategic value isn't tax-free wages but the retirement contribution capacity that spousal employment opens. A spouse on payroll qualifies for a separate Solo 401(k), SEP IRA, or defined benefit plan, doubling household retirement contribution capacity. Combined with pre-tax retirement contributions, spousal wages can effectively be tax-deferred until retirement.
Yes, hiring family members is fully legal under the Internal Revenue Code and is one of the few tax strategies the IRS publishes specific guidance for. The strategy must follow standard employment requirements: real work performed by the family member, reasonable wages matching market rate, proper documentation (W-4, W-2, timesheets), and wages paid into the family member's own bank account. Done correctly, it survives audit scrutiny.